If Bizarro NBA season continues …

ClassicBizarroEntering game 6 of the NBA Finals, I recap, in honor of Seinfeld and Sgt. Friday, some bizarro facts, ma’am:

  • Defending NBA champions
  • Considered by opponents, ‘Hollywood as hell’
  • Head coach turning 43 years old during year
  • Team featured 3 certain Hall of Fame players
  • One player on team with 18 years experience
  • Ranked 5th in the league in points per game
  • Ranked 2nd in league in offensive rating
  • Ranked 9th in league in defensive rating
  • Swept 1st round opponent
  • Pushed to 7 games in the Conference Finals
  • Joe Crawford would officiate 2 games in the Finals
  • Undisputed best player in Finals on team
  • Opponent’s best player a point guard
  • Lost Finals opener at home
  • Routed in 1st Finals road loss
  • Lost Finals game 5 on road by 10
  • Each road team had won once in the Finals

How things ended for the 1988 Los Angeles Lakers.

  • Won game 6 at home by 1 point
  • Won game 7 at home by 3 points
  • Best player was not Finals MVP

Below, see a re-post from July 2010. How Pat and Dwyane plotted the current Heat dynasty, aka The Meeting That Made The Decision Possible

DISSOLVE TO: A garden, somewhere outside Schenectady:

PAT O’RILEY:
So … Reinsdorf will move against you first. He’ll set up a meeting with someone that you absolutely trust … guaranteeing your ability to speak freely. And at that meeting, you’ll be setup over this whole tampering business [Pat drinks from a glass of wine as Dwyane watches him]. I like to drink wine more than I used to, anyways not as much as that Barkley fellow, but I’m drinking more….

Continue reading

Posted in 2TG Favorites, Sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are eventual NBA champs ever routed in Finals?

RrsRe.St.56A great friend and loyal Heat fan texted me the following after the Spurs crushed the Heat [PG version]:

Shameful day for Heat fans … impossible to win by 20ish and then lose by 30ish … real champions would never lose like this … need to use my time more wisely than following sports

That last line hit me in my David Allen / GTD / 43Folders.com soul.  So while I share the dismay–23 minutes after I had been assuring all in range that we were going to make it a game in the 4th–I’m keeping my mouth shut and doom in check given my abysmal track record of predictions about teams I’m rooting for or against.

So once again I turn to the NBA Basketball-Reference web site for a sliver of hope.  Considering a rout a loss by 20 or more; How often are NBA champions routed in the same Finals?  Gulp, not often.

magic-mcgee-rileyAs would be expected, all the teams which suffered routs experienced them on the road.  You have to back to 1984 & 1985 for a series in which the eventual champion was down in the series after the rout, as Miami is now.

Bizarrely, Pat Riley was involved on both sides of the rout scenarios in 4 out of the 7 years between 1982 and 1988.

Examples of NBA champions who were routed in the same Finals:

  • 2005 – San Antonio lost game 4 to Detroit by 31, which tied the series 2-2. They won the series in 7.
    2000 – Los Angeles lost game 5 to Indiana by 23. They were still up 3-2 and won the series the next game.
    1996 – Chicago lost game 4 to Seattle by 21, however that still left them up 3-1. They won the series in game 6.
    1988 – Los Angeles [Pat Riley] lost game 4 to Detroit by 25 which tied the series 2-2. They won the series in game 7.
    1985 – Los Angeles [Pat Riley] lost game 1 to Boston by 34.  This game was referred to at the time as the ‘Memorial Day Massacre.’ The Lakers won the series in game 7. Only 1 game in that series was decided by less than 7 points.
    1985 – The 1st year of the 2-3-2 format.
    1984 – Boston lost game 3 to Los Angeles [Pat Riley] by 33, which put them down 2-1. They won the series in 7.
    1982 – Los Angeles [Pat Riley] lost game 5 to Philadelphia by 33, which left them up 3-2. They won the series in game 6.

Close but no cigars:

2010 – Boston came close. After losing a potential close-out game 6 by 22, they lost game 7 by 4.
1998 – Utah sorta came close. After losing game 3 to Chicago by 42, they eventually lost in 6. However, game 6 was a 1 point loss [Jordan push-off] at home with a potential game 7 awaiting at home.

Posted in Sports | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Seward and Hagen fly under your radar

Abraham_lincoln_inauguration_1861

While I have always loved Lincoln, the recent adulation of him on the left constitutes an unmistakable signal to revisit my views. Not coincidentally, a recent review of Walter Stahr’s book, Seward: Lincoln’s Indispensable Man, uncovered a revealing exchange between the men, although perhaps not the type of exchange a Tony Kushner type would pine for.

It involves one of the signature remarks attributed to Lincoln from his first Inaugural Address – Lincoln’s first draft read as follows:

You can forbear the assault upon [the government], I can not shrink from the defense of it. With you, and not with me, is the solemn question of Shall it be peace, or a sword?

William Henry Seward’s revision:

Although passion has strained our bonds of affection too hardly they must not, I am sure they will not be broken. The mystic chords which proceeding from so many battle fields and so many patriot graves pass through all the hearts and all the hearths in this broad continent of ours will yet again harmonize in their ancient music when breathed upon by the guardian angel of the nation.

Lincoln’s final edit:

Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battle-field, and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.

Continue reading

Posted in Books & Reading, Entertainment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The two roads from two two

So how common is it for NBA conference finals to go 2-2? Is it an indicator of weakness? Do great teams ever struggle in the playoffs? The Basketball-Reference web site provides us details and we can draw our own conclusions. For a better sample size, I went all the way back to the 1st title for the detestable Chicago Bulls in 1991.

zzzHeat+v+Boston+CelticsBottom line, the Heat winning game 5 will put them on a pretty conventional track to the championship. But if they lose game 5 and repeat their prior year tracheotomy of the once proud Celtics franchise in the process of repeating as champions, now that is the stuff of legends.

O Captain! My Captain! our fearful trip is done;
The ship has weather’d every rack [think pirates, not South Beach], the prize we sought is won;

Which road are you rooting for?

Here’s the recap:

  • In 23 years, 23 out of 46 conference finals have gone 2-2. So once San Antonio went up 3-0 on Memphis, the Heat were practically doomed in game 4.
  • Teams emerging from a 2-2 conference finals have won 4 out of the last 5 championships.
  • The only recent year without a series tied at 2-2 in the Conference finals was 2011. However, that year was something of an outlier since Dallas arrived in the Finals after facing Cantinflas and Miami arrived after facing a team ‘led’ by Derrick Rose.
  • Both of Bryant and Gasol’s Lakers championships came after emerging from 2-2 conference finals.
  • Ditto the Boston Celtics big 3 in 2008.
  • Jordan’s Bulls emerged from 2-2 conference finals in 3 of their 6 championships.
  • 41% [9 of 22] of 2-2 conference finals series winners have eventually won the championship. But if we decrease the total by 4 — for the 4 years where both conferences went 2-2 — then the percentage rises to the magical 50% [9 of 18]  mark.
LeBron post 2011 Finals

LeBron post 2011 Finals – an introspective period

  • The home team was the game 5 winner in 13 of the last 22 [59%] conference finals that were tied 2-2. Not as high as the overall game 5 playoff winners which are frequently noted to be in the 80′s percentage.
  • Only one of those home teams — Miami in 2005 — did not win the series. Wade, you will recall, being injured is what swung that series.
  • The road team was the game 5 winner in 9 of the last 22 [41%] conference finals that were tied 2-2.
  • Only 2 of those road teams — Boston in 2012 and Indiana in 1994 — went on to lose the series.

The NBA conference finals tied at 2 listing since 1991, as well as the Frost and Whitman poems, are copied at end of post.

Continue reading

Posted in Sports | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Fully Baked Zito

barry-zito-giantsBarry Zito has hit on a clever tactic to be left alone. In a GQ interview, he acknowledged that he was a Christian who enjoyed reading C.S. Lewis. His interviewer, Nathaniel Penn, gives what I think is an accurate recap of the public perception [certainly was mine] of Zito prior to the interview:

During his prime years with the Oakland Athletics, Barry Zito won the Cy Young, dated Alyssa Milano, surfed, played guitar, meditated, and generally personified that beloved baseball archetype: the flaky lefty. In 2006 he signed a massive, history-making deal with the Giants, only to lose control, inexplicably, of his celebrated 12-to-6 curveball. Since then he has been great only in short bursts: a month here, six games there. Now he personified something else in baseball: the mega-contract bust. But last fall, with the Giants facing elimination in the playoffs, he saved their season and led them to their second World Series title in three years.

No more half-baked image or ideas for this guy. The 34 year-old MLB pitcher didn’t just shake off the flaky label in the interview, he beaned it on the first pitch and then rushed home plate and clubbed it as Flaky oozed its last vial of quirkiness across home plate. I mean jeez, Barry. Being married, owning and enjoying firearms would have been plenty. No, you had to go C.S. Lewis on them. Here are some of the gruesome details:

To what degree are you a different person than the person you were in Oakland?

I think I’m a little bit less of a seeker these days. I’ve found something that I just really love, which is the Christian faith, and it’s new to me. I grew up being a seeker and being completely out of the box and testing and reading and trying all different religious things and kind of philosophical approaches and such, and it’s kind of a backwards route. Most people are raised very rigidly in an organized religion and then they try to fight their way out of that. I needed structure [laughs]. A lot of these kind of spiritual things are all based on the self and that was just too—I couldn’t handle that anymore. I don’t know. I think it led to a form of—it can lead to narcissism, I think.

Even now I can hear the rumbling from secular humanists grabbing their broken-cross-I-mean-peace-sign pitchforks, ‘Narcissist? Whoa, is he saying…’ Perhaps I exaggerate Zito’s expected fall from celebrity grace [actual Grace being what he appears to have embraced]. One of my favorite MLB bloggers, Craig Calcaterra from Hardball Talk, a proud non-reactionary type, weighs in:

The bigger takeaway, I think, is that while it’s often tempting and easy to pigeonhole hippie/playboy/zen/surfer types on the one hand, and it’s tempting and easy to pigeonhole Christian gun owner types on the other, there are a lot of people — probably most people — who fit neither of those easy caricatures. Zito is his own dude, comes off as a pretty thoughtful dude, and there’s something cool about that.

By the way, in the specific Lewis book Zito cited, The Problem of Pain, he might have come across something like the following–Lewis on the issue which I’ll characterize as why bad things happen to good people:

Let me implore the reader to try to believe, if only for a moment, that God, who made these deserving people, may really be right when He thinks that their modest prosperity and the happiness of their children are not enough to make them blessed: that all this must fall from them in the end, and if they have not learned to know Him they will be wretched. And therefore He troubles them, warning them in advance of an insufficiency that one day they will have to discover. The life to themselves and their families stands between them and the recognition of their need; He makes that life less sweet to them. If God were proud He would hardly have us on such terms: but He is not proud, He stoops to conquer, He will have us even though we have shown that we prefer everything else to Him, and come to Him because there is ‘nothing better’ now to be had.

Posted in Sports | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Band of brothers and one liberal democrat

ESpnFIlms_SilverThe ESPN documentary on the 1972 U.S. Olympic basketball team, Silver Reunion is a study in ethics. All but one member of that team have not wavered from the team’s initial position to not accept anything less than the gold medal they earned.

The out of step team member is Tom McMillen [a true lefty], who went on to serve in Congress as a Democrat from Maryland and has long sought to get his teammates to compromise on the issue. His efforts began in the 1990′s. He proposed the following as recently as last year:

Ten years ago [2002], I asked the IOC to award the 1972 U.S. team dual gold medals to rectify the errors of that game. … when I brought up the issue with my former teammates, all were willing to accept dual medals.

That last statement was a lie. Watch the documentary around the 10 minute mark to understand just how blatant a lie it remains. And while the documentary avoids dealing directly with the feelings of his teammates towards McMillen, the documentarian, Rory Karpf, does manages to convey a sense of the disdain towards him through the reactions to his idea, the wordless ones speaking the loudest.

Just how low will Tommy go?

Included in his most recent attempt at compromise on the medal issue, McMillen abandons his initial focus on “officials errors” and attempts to have the decision focus on … wait for it … orphaned kids [cue the presidential photo op]. More McMillen from his 2012 article:

I intend to propose a “grand compromise” … If the members of the Soviet team agree to the awarding of dual gold medals to our team and the IOC approves, the U.S. team will donate our medals, worth a great deal as sports memorabilia, to a Russian charity for orphaned children.

The attempt to conflate the medal issue with orphaned children is transparently dishonest. The documentary reinforced my opinion of McMillen’s efforts in this area and the idea that earning respect is a much different thing than getting votes. One requires adherence to principles, the other attempts to inconspicuously avoid them. That distinction is something McMillen may have to accept, in lieu of the respect of his 1972 U.S. Olympic teammates.

1972-basketball-USvsUSSR-044Watching that 1972 Olympic gold medal game with my father and brother was something I will never forget. It was my first ‘walk outside the house to check for flying frogs sports moment.’ [The next would come on July 4/5 1985, aka the Rick Camp wasted miracle game]. At some point I actually said out loud, ‘they can’t do this to the United States,’ in Spanish of course [you had to be there]. While they didn’t lose the game, the Cold War defeat in Germany stung even, or especially, in Miami.

A basketball note. The clutchest free throws in basketball history belong to Doug Collins at the 1972 Olympics. I will fight anyone who attempts to argue otherwise, especially those physically impaired.

To the following 11 members of the true 1972 Olympic Gold medal basketball team, much respect:

  • Mike Bantom
  • Jim Brewer
  • Tommy Burleson
  • Doug Collins
  • Kenneth Davis
  • James Forbes
  • Tom Henderson
  • Dwight Jones
  • Robert Jones
  • Kevin Joyce
  • Ed Ratleff
Posted in Sports | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Code Red: Derrick Rose’s a Bull Sitter

In a Few Good Men, Col Jessup’s Code Red was exposed given the implicit contradiction in his two orders. In the case of Derrick Rose, his two guaranteed contracts [totaling $355 million] contradict the most legitimate reason for a player to sit when coming off an injury; the risk of re-aggravating the injury in such a way as to hurt their future earning potential.

bullsitterIt would not be an exaggeration to say that no player has ever had less of a case to sit for that reason than Derrick Rose. As a Miami Heat fan, the circumstances surrounding Rose’s refusal to play–teammates playing through their own injuries and illnesses have highlighted the fact that Rose might the healthiest Bull left on the roster–only adds to our magical year. How? By damaging the psyche of a key opponent for years to come. His daily refusal to play is the equivalent of tossing up an air ball at the buzzer, for 6 consecutive weeks.

Which is why this Heat fan is rooting for the Chicago Bulls in game 7 vs the Nets tonight. Because if Rose sits through the Heat series, he will be more damaged than Leonard Lowe running low on L-Dopa on a weekend pass. For Bulls opponents, it will be the equivalent of having yearly unprotected draft picks from any organization which allows Michael Jordan to have influence over their personnel decisions. How to describe … it’s like if I hated the Knicks and saw their squad littered with selfish thug-like clowns … oh, wait….

A look at the evolution of expectations on Rose’s return:

  • April 2012 – Injured – Return expected between 8 and 12 months
  • Early Jan 2013 – Return likely in month 10, after the all-star game
  • Late Jan 2013 – Practicing and traveling with team
  • March 2013 – Finally cleared to play
  • April 2013 – The limits of patience
  • May 2013 – Et II Scottie Pippen?

Col Jessup: What do you mean he won’t play?

ColJessup

Posted in Sports | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

I Spy changes in Jeffrey Loria

Loria before revenue sharing:

aaaCarl Loria

Loria after revenue sharing:

Jeffrey Loria, Julie Loria

Can you spot the new objects?

  1. Ellie Fredrickson has been replaced

  2. Bulletproof glass

Posted in Marlins Ballpark & Finances | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Jason Terry and Saint Longinus confront their God


1terry poster
Fra_Angelico_027

Posted in Sports | Tagged | Leave a comment

Why Christianity is not the UN

An open letter to my Emmaus brothers.

How does our self-professed Christian faith differ from being a UN diplomat? The spiritual veil is much more easily pierced than diplomatic immunity. Waving a Christian card when personal behavior runs contrary to what the card should represent, damages both. In the news this week we see the negative ramifications of having a football player with Ray Lewis’ background be the person most vocal about his Christian faith at the Super Bowl. The point is that if your current actions don’t match your Christian beliefs, only self-promotion is served by such a public advocacy.

In my case, I had a financial dispute with a fellow Emmaus brother which ended with an unpaid debt. The feelings it evoked had predictable stages; anger, disappointment, wishing it would go away. But since very little in my Emmaus walk has benefited from wishing something away, I choose this path. This path is not about recovering monies which I have now written off. This path is meant to take the dispute out of the realm of a personal dispute and address the elephant in the Emmaus meeting room. How are we expected to behave within the Emmamus community when serious disputes arise among Emmaus brothers at the same Parish?

There are certain basic rules which any Emmaus brother would instantly acknowledge:

  • Emmaus Meetings are not to be used to discuss personal disputes
  • Emmaus Retreats are sacred
  • Confidentiality is sacred

Confidentiality pertains to what is said in meetings and Retreats. I do not believe that the principle of confidentiality applies to ongoing unethical behavior outside of Emmaus [for example in business] especially if that behavior has never been the subject of a sharing or discussion within Emmaus. My argument here is that the principle of confidentiality is damaged more by those who seek to hide behind it inappropriately than those who would point out the unethical behavior.

Who is to supposed to determine when or how to point out ongoing unethical or inappropriate behavior? Each of us following his or her own conscious. The facts and our personal integrity as deemed by our peers can sort out the rest over time, without ever using Emmaus meetings or Retreats to make our case. All the while respecting and adhering to the principle of confidentiality.

I deem that right and just.

Posted in Catholic Faith & Inspiration | Tagged | 8 Comments